Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Robuuste Nomologische Validiteit× | Discriminante Validiteit× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Psychometrie | Psychometrie |
| Familie | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 1955 | 1959 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Cronbach & Meehl (seminal framework); later extended by Shadish, Cook, and Campbell | Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske |
| Type≠ | Validity assessment / construct validation | Validity evidence / psychometric evaluation |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| Aliassen | nomological network validity, robust validity testing, nomological validity, RNV | discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity |
| Verwant | 5 | 5 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Robust nomological validity evaluates whether a psychological construct relates to theoretically expected variables in the predicted directions, using statistically robust estimation methods that remain trustworthy when distributional assumptions are violated. It tests the construct's place within its nomological network — the web of theoretical relationships that define its meaning. | Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|