Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Robuust Niet-lineair Autoregressief Gedistribueerd Lag (Robuust NARDL) Model× | ARDL Bounds Test× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Econometrie | Econometrie |
| Familie | Regression model | Regression model |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 2014–2020s | 2001 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Extension of Shin, Yu & Greenwood-Nimmo (2014) NARDL framework with robust (outlier-resistant) estimation | Pesaran, Shin & Smith |
| Type≠ | Nonlinear time-series regression with robust estimation | Cointegration test / Autoregressive distributed lag model |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Shin, Y., Yu, B., & Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In W. C. Horrace & R. C. Sickles (Eds.), Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt (pp. 281–314). Springer. DOI ↗ | Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326. DOI ↗ |
| Aliassen | Robust Nonlinear ARDL, Outlier-Robust NARDL, Robust Asymmetric ARDL, R-NARDL | Pesaran bounds test, bounds testing approach, ARDL cointegration test, ARDL Sınır Testi (Pesaran Bounds Test) |
| Verwant≠ | 3 | 4 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Robust NARDL marries the asymmetric cointegration framework of Shin, Yu, and Greenwood-Nimmo (2014) with outlier-resistant estimation. It decomposes a regressor into positive and negative partial sums, tests for asymmetric long-run relationships via a bounds test, and replaces the OLS criterion with an M- or MM-estimator to guard against leverage points and additive outliers common in macroeconomic and financial time series. | The ARDL bounds test is an autoregressive distributed lag method that tests for a cointegrating (long-run level) relationship between time series, introduced by Pesaran, Shin and Smith in 2001. Unlike the Johansen procedure, it remains valid whether the variables are I(0), I(1) or a mix of the two, and it is more reliable than Johansen in small samples of roughly 30 to 80 observations. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|