Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Robuuste Confirmatieve Factoranalyse× | Confirmatory factor analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied≠ | Statistiek | Psychometrie |
| Familie | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 1984–1994 | 1969 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Satorra & Bentler (robust SE/chi-square corrections); Browne (ADF estimator) | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| Type≠ | Confirmatory latent variable model with robust estimation | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Satorra, A. & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Sage. link ↗ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| Aliassen | Robust CFA, CFA with robust standard errors, Satorra-Bentler CFA, non-normal CFA | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| Verwant≠ | 6 | 4 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Robust confirmatory factor analysis fits a pre-specified factor structure to observed data while correcting standard errors and goodness-of-fit statistics for violations of multivariate normality. It is the preferred variant of CFA whenever Likert-type, skewed, or kurtotic indicators make the classical normal-theory estimator unreliable. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|