Methoden vergelijken

	Protocol-gebaseerde meta-analyse	Scoping Review
Vakgebied	Scientometrie	Scientometrie
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan	1990s–2015 (Cochrane established 1993; PROSPERO launched 2011; PRISMA-P 2015)	2005
Grondlegger	Cochrane Collaboration; formalized through PROSPERO and PRISMA-P initiatives	Hilary Arksey & Lisa O'Malley
Type	Evidence synthesis with pre-registered protocol	Evidence synthesis review design
Oorspronkelijke bron	Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2023). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 6.4). Cochrane.	Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32.
Aliassen	pre-registered meta-analysis, prospective meta-analysis, registered meta-analysis, protocol-driven meta-analysis	scoping study, literature scoping, evidence mapping review, rapid evidence map
Verwant	4	6
Samenvatting	A protocol-based meta-analysis is a meta-analysis conducted according to a detailed, pre-registered protocol that specifies all key methodological decisions — research questions, eligibility criteria, search strategy, outcome measures, and statistical methods — before data collection begins. Pre-registration, typically through PROSPERO or a comparable registry, distinguishes this approach from post-hoc or exploratory meta-analyses and substantially reduces the risk of selective reporting and outcome switching.	A scoping review is a systematic evidence-synthesis method that maps the breadth and nature of research on a topic — identifying key concepts, evidence types, and gaps — without necessarily appraising study quality or pooling effect sizes. Developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and refined by Levac and colleagues (2010), it is particularly valuable for emerging or heterogeneous fields where a full systematic review would be premature or infeasible.