ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Propensity Score Matching in Education Research×Propensity Score Weighting (PSW / IPW)×
VakgebiedCausale inferentieCausale inferentie
FamilieRegression modelRegression model
Jaar van ontstaan1983 (foundational); education adoption widespread from late 1990s1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
GrondleggerRosenbaum & Rubin (1983); widely adopted in education research via Shadish, Cook & Campbell (2002)Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
TypeQuasi-experimental / matching-based causal inferenceCausal inference / reweighting
Oorspronkelijke bronRosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
AliassenPSM in education, educational PSM, PSM for program evaluation in schools, propensity matching educationPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Verwant56
SamenvattingPropensity Score Matching (PSM) in education research is a quasi-experimental technique that creates comparable treatment and control groups from observational student, teacher, or school data. By balancing groups on observed background characteristics, it enables credible causal estimates of educational interventions — such as tutoring programs, school choice policies, or teacher professional development — when random assignment is infeasible.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: Propensity Score Matching in Education Research · Propensity Score Weighting. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-20 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare