Methoden vergelijken

	PRISMA-conform Scoping Review	Scoping Review
Vakgebied	Scientometrie	Scientometrie
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan	2018 (PRISMA-ScR extension); 2005 (scoping review framework)	2005
Grondlegger	Tricco et al. (PRISMA-ScR); Arksey & O'Malley (scoping review framework)	Hilary Arksey & Lisa O'Malley
Type	Evidence synthesis — scoping review with standardized reporting	Evidence synthesis review design
Oorspronkelijke bron	Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., ... & Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473.	Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32.
Aliassen	PRISMA-ScR scoping review, scoping review with PRISMA-ScR, PRISMA scoping review, transparent scoping review	scoping study, literature scoping, evidence mapping review, rapid evidence map
Verwant	6	6
Samenvatting	A PRISMA-compliant scoping review is a scoping review conducted and reported according to the PRISMA for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) extension, a 20-item checklist plus explanation published by Tricco et al. in 2018. Scoping reviews map the breadth and volume of evidence on a topic without synthesizing effect sizes; the PRISMA-ScR overlay adds transparency, reproducibility, and reporting completeness standards analogous to those PRISMA provides for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.	A scoping review is a systematic evidence-synthesis method that maps the breadth and nature of research on a topic — identifying key concepts, evidence types, and gaps — without necessarily appraising study quality or pooling effect sizes. Developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and refined by Levac and colleagues (2010), it is particularly valuable for emerging or heterogeneous fields where a full systematic review would be premature or infeasible.