ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Synthetische Controle Methode voor Beleidsevaluatie×Instrumentele Variabelen (IV) Methode voor Causale Inferentie×
VakgebiedCausale inferentieGezondheidseconomie
FamilieRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan2003-20101990s (modern applications)
GrondleggerAlberto Abadie & Javier Gardeazabal; extended by Abadie, Diamond & HainmuellerAngrist & Pischke (applied econometrics); rooted in econometric theory
TypeCausal inference / comparative case studyMethod
Oorspronkelijke bronAbadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2010). Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California's Tobacco Control Program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(490), 493-505. DOI ↗Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press. link ↗
AliassenSynthetic Control Method, SCM, Synthetic Control, Abadie-Diamond-Hainmueller methodIV, two-stage least squares, TSLS, causal estimation
Verwant53
SamenvattingThe Synthetic Control Method (SCM) is a causal inference technique for evaluating the effect of a policy or intervention on a single treated unit — such as a region, country, or firm — by constructing a weighted combination of untreated comparison units that closely mirrors the treated unit before the intervention. Introduced by Abadie and Gardeazabal (2003) and formalized by Abadie, Diamond, and Hainmueller (2010), it provides a data-driven, transparent counterfactual for comparative case studies.Instrumental variables (IV) is an econometric method to estimate causal effects when treatment or exposure is not randomly assigned and confounding is severe or unmeasured. IV relies on a third variable (instrument) that influences treatment but does not directly affect the outcome, allowing researchers to isolate the causal effect from the noise of confounding. Developed extensively in econometrics (Angrist & Pischke, 1990s–2000s), IV methods are increasingly used in health economics and health services research to leverage natural experiments and policy changes.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: Policy Evaluation Synthetic Control Method · Instrumental Variables in Health Research. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-18 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare