Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Beleidsevaluatie Event-study-ontwerp× | Panel Data Fixed Effects Model× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied≠ | Causale inferentie | Econometrie |
| Familie | Regression model | Regression model |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 1993-2021 | 2014 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Andrews (1993), MacKinlay (1997); formalized for policy evaluation by Freyaldenhoven, Hansen & Shapiro (2019) and Callaway & Sant'Anna (2021) | Hsiao (textbook treatment); within transformation of panel data |
| Type≠ | Quasi-experimental / causal inference | Panel data regression |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Callaway, B., & Sant'Anna, P. H. C. (2021). Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 200-230. DOI ↗ | Hsiao, C. (2014). Analysis of Panel Data (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. DOI ↗ |
| Aliassen | event study, event-study DiD, dynamic DiD, PEESD | fixed effects model, within estimator, panel fixed-effects regression, Panel Veri — Sabit Etkiler Modeli |
| Verwant | 5 | 5 |
| Samenvatting≠ | A policy evaluation event study design is a quasi-experimental approach that estimates causal effects of a policy by plotting treatment-period-by-period coefficients around a common event time. It extends difference-in-differences to visualize both pre-treatment parallel trends and the dynamic post-treatment evolution of the policy effect, and has become the standard credibility check in applied policy research. | The Panel Data Fixed Effects model estimates relationships from panel data (the same units observed over several time periods) while controlling for unit- and/or time-specific effects, supporting causal inference. It is developed as the within estimator in standard treatments such as Hsiao's Analysis of Panel Data (2014). |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|