ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Testen van Ordinale Meetinvariantie×Multi-Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MG-CFA)×
VakgebiedPsychometriePsychometrie
FamilieLatent structureLatent structure
Jaar van ontstaan1984–20111971
GrondleggerRoger Millsap; Bengt MuthénKarl Jöreskog
TypeMulti-group model comparisonMeasurement model / invariance test
Oorspronkelijke bronMillsap, R. E. (2011). Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance. Routledge. ISBN: 978-1848728936Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗
Aliassenordinal MI, measurement invariance for ordinal data, ordinal CFA invariance, categorical measurement invarianceMG-CFA, multi-group CFA, measurement invariance testing, multi-sample CFA
Verwant66
SamenvattingOrdinal measurement invariance testing evaluates whether a multi-group confirmatory factor model holds equivalent measurement properties across groups when scale items are ordinal — such as Likert-type response scales. It uses polychoric correlations and categorical estimators (WLSMV/DWLS) rather than Pearson-based methods, correcting the systematic bias that arises when ordinal data are treated as continuous.Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis tests whether a measurement model holds equivalently across two or more groups — such as cultures, genders, or time points. By imposing increasingly stringent equality constraints and comparing model fit, it determines whether comparisons of latent mean scores are justified.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: Ordinal Measurement Invariance · Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-19 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare