ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Testen van Ordinale Meetinvariantie×Confirmatory factor analysis×
VakgebiedPsychometriePsychometrie
FamilieLatent structureLatent structure
Jaar van ontstaan1984–20111969
GrondleggerRoger Millsap; Bengt MuthénKarl Gustav Jöreskog
TypeMulti-group model comparisonHypothesis-testing latent variable model
Oorspronkelijke bronMillsap, R. E. (2011). Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance. Routledge. ISBN: 978-1848728936Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗
Aliassenordinal MI, measurement invariance for ordinal data, ordinal CFA invariance, categorical measurement invarianceCFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis
Verwant64
SamenvattingOrdinal measurement invariance testing evaluates whether a multi-group confirmatory factor model holds equivalent measurement properties across groups when scale items are ordinal — such as Likert-type response scales. It uses polychoric correlations and categorical estimators (WLSMV/DWLS) rather than Pearson-based methods, correcting the systematic bias that arises when ordinal data are treated as continuous.Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: Ordinal Measurement Invariance · Confirmatory factor analysis. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-19 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare