Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Newcastle-Ottawa Scale× | PRISMA Checklist× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Onderzoeksmethodologie | Onderzoeksmethodologie |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 2000 | 2021 (original 2009) |
| Grondlegger≠ | Wells et al. (Ottawa Hospital Research Institute) | Page et al. (PRISMA Group) |
| Type≠ | Research team assessment | Systematic review author reporting checklist |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Wells, G. A., Shea, B., O'Connell, D., Peterson, J., Welch, V., Losos, M., & Tugwell, P. (2000). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Retrieved from Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. link ↗ | Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. DOI ↗ |
| Aliassen≠ | NOS | PRISMA, PRISMA 2020 |
| Verwant | 4 | 4 |
| Samenvatting≠ | The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) is a widely used tool for assessing the methodological quality of observational studies (case-control and cohort designs) included in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Developed by Wells et al. at Ottawa Hospital in 2000, it provides explicit criteria and a star-based scoring system that enables transparent, quantitative comparison of study quality across evidence syntheses. | PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is a 27-item evidence-based checklist published in 2021 (updated from 2009) to standardize reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Endorsed by over 500 journals, PRISMA is the international standard for evidence synthesis reporting, used across healthcare, psychology, education, and social sciences to ensure transparency and reproducibility. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|