Methoden vergelijken

	Netwerkgebaseerde mapping review	Scoping Review
Vakgebied	Scientometrie	Scientometrie
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan	2000s–2010s	2005
Grondlegger	Petticrew & Roberts (mapping review); network overlay adopted from bibliometric network analysis tradition	Hilary Arksey & Lisa O'Malley
Type	Evidence synthesis method with network analysis overlay	Evidence synthesis review design
Oorspronkelijke bron	Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Blackwell Publishing. ISBN: 978-1405121101	Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32.
Aliassen	network mapping review, citation-network mapping review, network-enhanced evidence mapping, network-informed mapping review	scoping study, literature scoping, evidence mapping review, rapid evidence map
Verwant	6	6
Samenvatting	A network-based mapping review combines the breadth of a traditional evidence mapping exercise with bibliometric network analysis to chart the structural landscape of a research field. Rather than simply cataloguing studies by topic, this approach constructs citation, co-authorship, or co-word networks to reveal clusters of intellectual activity, influential works, and collaboration patterns — producing both a visual and a descriptive map of the evidence base.	A scoping review is a systematic evidence-synthesis method that maps the breadth and nature of research on a topic — identifying key concepts, evidence types, and gaps — without necessarily appraising study quality or pooling effect sizes. Developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and refined by Levac and colleagues (2010), it is particularly valuable for emerging or heterogeneous fields where a full systematic review would be premature or infeasible.