Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Multilevel-inhoudsvaliditeit× | Discriminante Validiteit× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Psychometrie | Psychometrie |
| Familie | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 1975–2000s | 1959 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Rooted in Lawshe (1975) for content validity; multilevel extension developed through multilevel psychometric literature from the 1990s onward | Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske |
| Type≠ | Validity evaluation / expert judgment | Validity evidence / psychometric evaluation |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| Aliassen | hierarchical content validity, nested-data content validity, multilevel scale content evaluation, MCV | discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity |
| Verwant≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Multilevel content validity extends the classical content validity framework to settings where items, raters, or respondents are nested within hierarchical structures — such as students within schools, patients within clinics, or items rated by panels from distinct cultural or professional groups. It ensures that scale content is relevant and representative at every level of the hierarchy, not just in the aggregate. | Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|