Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Multi-groeps Rasch-model× | Multi-Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MG-CFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Psychometrie | Psychometrie |
| Familie | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 1960 (Rasch); 1980s–1990s (multi-group extensions) | 1971 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Georg Rasch (single-group); extended to multi-group applications by Fischer, Molenaar, and others | Karl Jöreskog |
| Type≠ | Item response model / measurement invariance test | Measurement model / invariance test |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Fischer, G. H. & Molenaar, I. W. (Eds.) (1995). Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications. Springer. ISBN: 978-0387944296 | Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗ |
| Aliassen | MG-Rasch, Rasch measurement invariance, multi-group 1PL IRT, cross-group Rasch analysis | MG-CFA, multi-group CFA, measurement invariance testing, multi-sample CFA |
| Verwant | 6 | 6 |
| Samenvatting≠ | The multi-group Rasch model fits the one-parameter logistic item response model simultaneously across two or more distinct groups, testing whether item difficulty parameters are invariant across groups. It is the primary psychometric tool for establishing that a scale measures the same latent trait with the same metric in each group, a prerequisite for meaningful score comparisons. | Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis tests whether a measurement model holds equivalently across two or more groups — such as cultures, genders, or time points. By imposing increasingly stringent equality constraints and comparing model fit, it determines whether comparisons of latent mean scores are justified. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|