ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Moderatie (Interactie) Analyse×Causale Mediatie-Analyse (Natuurlijk Direct en Indirect Effect)×
VakgebiedCausale inferentieCausale inferentie
FamilieRegression modelRegression model
Jaar van ontstaan20182010
GrondleggerAiken & West (1991); Hayes (PROCESS, 2018)Pearl (2001); general framework by Imai, Keele & Tingley (2010)
TypeLinear regression with interaction termCounterfactual causal decomposition
Oorspronkelijke bronHayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis (2nd ed.). Guilford Press. ISBN: 978-1462534654Pearl, J. (2001). Direct and Indirect Effects. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI), 411-420. link ↗
Aliasseninteraction analysis, moderated regression, simple moderation, Düzenleyici Değişken Analizi (Moderation / İnteraksiyon)natural direct effect, natural indirect effect, NDE / NIE decomposition, counterfactual mediation
Verwant55
SamenvattingModeration analysis tests whether the effect of a predictor X on an outcome Y changes with the level of a third variable W, the moderator. It is estimated within a regression framework through an interaction term X×W, popularised by Aiken & West (1991) and Hayes's PROCESS macro (2018).Causal mediation analysis is a counterfactual framework that splits a treatment's total effect into a Natural Direct Effect (NDE) and a Natural Indirect Effect (NIE) that runs through a mediator. The modern general approach was formalised by Pearl (2001) and Imai, Keele and Tingley (2010), giving the decomposition a precise causal interpretation.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: Moderation Analysis · Causal Mediation Analysis. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-17 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare