Methoden vergelijken

	Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool: Beoordeling van Kwaliteit Over Studieontwerpen	GRADE Evidence Profiling
Vakgebied	Onderzoeksmethodologie	Onderzoeksmethodologie
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan	2014 (updated 2018)	2008
Grondlegger	Pluye et al.	Guyatt et al. (GRADE Working Group)
Type	Research methodology evaluation	Research team / Guideline panel assessment
Oorspronkelijke bron	Pluye, P., & Hong, Q. N. (2014). Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 29–45.	Guyatt, G., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008). GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 336(7650), 924–926.
Aliassen	MMAT, MMAT 2018	GRADE, GRADE approach
Verwant	4	4
Samenvatting	MMAT (Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool) is a practical, design-agnostic quality assessment tool developed by Pluye et al. (2014, updated 2018) to evaluate the methodological quality of quantitative (RCTs, non-randomized studies), qualitative, and mixed-methods studies. Unlike tools designed for single paradigms (e.g., Cochrane RoB 2 for RCTs), MMAT provides unified criteria applicable across diverse research methodologies, making it particularly useful for systematic reviews incorporating multiple study designs.	GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) is a systematic, transparent framework for assessing the certainty of evidence and determining the strength of clinical recommendations in healthcare. Published in 2008 by Guyatt et al., GRADE has become the international standard for guideline development, used by the World Health Organization, Cochrane, and most major clinical guideline organizations worldwide.