ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Schaal voor marktgevoeligheid×Innovatieambidextrie-schaal×
VakgebiedStrategisch managementStrategisch management
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan19901991
GrondleggerAjay Kohli, Bernard Jaworski, and George S. DayJames G. March
TypeOrganizational self-report questionnaireOrganizational self-report questionnaire
Oorspronkelijke bronKohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1–18. DOI ↗March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. DOI ↗
AliassenMSC, Market Intelligence CapabilityAmbidexterity Scale, Exploration-Exploitation Scale
Verwant55
SamenvattingMarket Sensing Capability (MSC) refers to an organization's ability to systematically gather, interpret, and respond to market information about customers, competitors, and market trends. Building on Kohli and Jaworski's (1990) market orientation construct and George Day's (1994) framework of market-driven organizations, the MSC scale measures three interconnected processes: intelligence generation (acquiring market information), dissemination (sharing information across functions), and responsiveness (acting on market insights). Organizations with strong MSC detect competitive threats earlier, understand customer needs more deeply, and adapt strategies faster than competitors with weaker sensing capabilities.Innovation Ambidexterity—the organizational capacity to simultaneously engage in exploration (pursuing radical, novel innovations) and exploitation (improving and extending existing products and processes)—is fundamental to sustained competitive advantage. March (1991) formalized this trade-off in Organization Science, arguing that organizations must balance the two to survive and thrive. Exploration alone leads to variety but insufficient returns; exploitation alone leads to competence traps and vulnerability to disruption. This scale, operationalized by He and Wong (2004) and extended by Jansen et al. (2006), measures organizational capability in both domains and the degree to which firms balance competing innovation imperatives.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 3 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: Market Sensing Capability Scale · Innovation Ambidexterity Scale. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-19 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare