Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Longitudinale nomologische validiteit× | Discriminante Validiteit× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Psychometrie | Psychometrie |
| Familie | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 1955 (concept); longitudinal extension 1990s–2000s | 1959 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept, 1955); longitudinal extension developed in organizational and personality research from the 1990s onward | Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske |
| Type≠ | Validity evaluation | Validity evidence / psychometric evaluation |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| Aliassen | longitudinal construct validity, nomological network validation across time, longitudinal criterion-related validity, temporal nomological validity | discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity |
| Verwant≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Longitudinal nomological validity evaluates whether a construct's theoretically predicted relationships with other constructs hold consistently across multiple measurement occasions. It extends the nomological network framework of Cronbach and Meehl (1955) to longitudinal designs, testing whether a scale behaves as theory demands not only at a single time point but over time. | Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|