Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Interpretatieve Kritische Discourse Analyse× | Thematische Analyse× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied≠ | Kwalitatief | Kwalitatief onderzoek |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 1990s–2000s | 2006 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Norman Fairclough; Ruth Wodak; Teun A. van Dijk (interpretive framing developed through constructivist qualitative traditions) | Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke |
| Type≠ | Qualitative discourse analysis design | Method |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. ISBN: 978-0745612126 | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| Aliassen≠ | interpretive CDA, constructivist critical discourse analysis, meaning-centred CDA, CDA-interpretivist | TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis |
| Verwant≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Interpretive critical discourse analysis (interpretive CDA) combines the power-and-ideology lens of critical discourse analysis with an interpretivist epistemology that foregrounds meaning-making, context, and the researcher's own positionality. It examines how language constructs social reality, legitimises or challenges power relations, and circulates ideological assumptions — while acknowledging that both the texts under study and the analyst's reading of them are socially situated and context-dependent. | Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|