Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Dynamic Matching Estimator× | Panel Data Matching Estimator× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Causale inferentie | Causale inferentie |
| Familie | Regression model | Regression model |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 2010 | 1997-2021 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Lechner & Miquel (2010); building on Heckman, Ichimura & Todd (1998) | Heckman, Ichimura & Todd (1997); Imai, Kim & Wang (2021) for panel extension |
| Type≠ | Nonparametric causal inference / matching | Quasi-experimental causal estimator |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Lechner, M., & Miquel, R. (2010). Identification of the effects of dynamic treatments by sequential conditional independence assumptions. Empirical Economics, 39(1), 111-137. DOI ↗ | Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. E. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Review of Economic Studies, 64(4), 605-654. DOI ↗ |
| Aliassen | dynamic treatment matching, sequential matching estimator, dynamic selection-on-observables, DME | panel matching, matching-on-panel-data, longitudinal matching estimator, PDME |
| Verwant | 6 | 6 |
| Samenvatting≠ | The Dynamic Matching Estimator extends standard matching methods to settings where treatment is assigned sequentially over multiple periods. Instead of a single treatment decision, units receive or forgo treatment at each time point, and the estimator identifies causal effects of entire treatment histories by matching on time-varying covariates and past treatment paths, under sequential conditional independence assumptions. | The panel data matching estimator identifies causal treatment effects by pairing each treated unit with one or more control units that share similar covariate histories in the pre-treatment periods. By exploiting the longitudinal structure of panel data, it controls for both observed time-varying confounders and stable unit characteristics, estimating the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) without requiring a parallel-trends assumption. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|