Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Discourseanalyse× | Documentanalyse× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Kwalitatief onderzoek | Kwalitatief onderzoek |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) | 1920 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell | Max Weber and Karl Mannheim |
| Type | Method | Method |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ | Scott, J. (1990). A Matter of Record: Documentary Sources in Social Research. Polity Press. ISBN: 978-0745608419 |
| Aliassen≠ | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis | documentary analysis, textual analysis, content analysis of documents, archival research |
| Verwant≠ | 2 | 4 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. | Document analysis is a systematic qualitative research method for examining written, visual, or audiovisual sources—such as policy documents, historical records, organizational records, media reports, emails, social media posts, photographs, or videos—to extract meaning, identify patterns, and understand social phenomena. Developed by Weber and Mannheim in early 20th-century sociology, the method bridges historical research, content analysis, and textual interpretation. Document analysis is used across disciplines to understand organizational change, policy evolution, media representation, historical events, and cultural meaning. Documents provide evidence of what organizations, institutions, or societies value, decide, and communicate, often revealing contradictions between policy and practice. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|