Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Difference-in-Discontinuities Design× | Panel Data Fixed Effects Model× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied≠ | Causale inferentie | Econometrie |
| Familie | Regression model | Regression model |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 2016 | 2014 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Grembi, Nannicini & Troiano | Hsiao (textbook treatment); within transformation of panel data |
| Type≠ | Hybrid quasi-experimental causal design (RDD + DID) | Panel data regression |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Grembi, V., Nannicini, T. & Troiano, U. (2016). Do Fiscal Rules Matter? A Difference-in-Discontinuities Design. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 8(3), 1-30. DOI ↗ | Hsiao, C. (2014). Analysis of Panel Data (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. DOI ↗ |
| Aliassen≠ | diff-in-disc, DiD-RDD, Süreksizliklerde Fark (Difference-in-Discontinuities) | fixed effects model, within estimator, panel fixed-effects regression, Panel Veri — Sabit Etkiler Modeli |
| Verwant | 5 | 5 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Difference-in-Discontinuities is a hybrid quasi-experimental design that fuses regression discontinuity (RDD) with difference-in-differences (DID), introduced by Grembi, Nannicini and Troiano (2016). It compares the discontinuity at the same cutoff value across two periods to isolate a causal effect. | The Panel Data Fixed Effects model estimates relationships from panel data (the same units observed over several time periods) while controlling for unit- and/or time-specific effects, supporting causal inference. It is developed as the within estimator in standard treatments such as Hsiao's Analysis of Panel Data (2014). |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|