Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Conversatieanalyse× | Discourseanalyse× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied≠ | Kwalitatief | Kwalitatief onderzoek |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | Late 1960s–1974 (foundational lectures 1964–1972; landmark article 1974) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| Grondlegger≠ | Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| Type≠ | Qualitative research method | Method |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. link ↗ | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| Aliassen≠ | CA, talk-in-interaction, sequential analysis, interactional analysis | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| Verwant≠ | 6 | 2 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Conversation Analysis (CA) is a qualitative research method that examines the fine-grained sequential structure of naturally occurring talk and social interaction. Developed by sociologists Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson in the 1960s and 1970s, CA investigates how participants in a conversation accomplish social actions — such as invitations, refusals, or diagnoses — through the precise moment-by-moment organisation of their talk, including turn-taking, sequence structure, repair, and recipient design. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|