Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Content Validity× | Discriminante Validiteit× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Psychometrie | Psychometrie |
| Familie | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 1975 | 1959 |
| Grondlegger≠ | C. H. Lawshe (quantitative framework); earlier qualitative traditions in educational measurement | Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske |
| Type≠ | Validity evidence / expert judgement procedure | Validity evidence / psychometric evaluation |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| Aliassen | content-related validity, logical validity, face validity, content validation | discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity |
| Verwant≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Content validity is evidence that a measurement instrument adequately samples the full domain of the construct it is intended to measure. It is established through systematic expert review and quantified with indices such as Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Lynn's Content Validity Index (CVI), making it the foundational validity step in scale development. | Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|