ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Conover-Iman Post-Hoc Test×Nemenyi Post-Hoc Test voor Friedman×
VakgebiedStatistiekStatistiek
FamilieRegression modelHypothesis test
Jaar van ontstaan19791963
GrondleggerConover & ImanPeter Nemenyi
TypeNonparametric post-hoc multiple comparisonNonparametric post-hoc multiple comparison
Oorspronkelijke bronConover, W. J. & Iman, R. L. (1979). On Multiple-Comparisons Procedures. Technical Report LA-7677-MS, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory. link ↗Nemenyi, P. (1963). Distribution-Free Multiple Comparisons. PhD thesis, Princeton University. link ↗
AliassenConover-Iman post-hoc test, Conover post-hoc test, Conover-Iman Post-Hoc TestiNemenyi Testi — Friedman Post-Hoc, Nemenyi multiple comparison test, Nemenyi procedure
Verwant35
SamenvattingThe Conover-Iman test is a rank-based post-hoc procedure, introduced by Conover and Iman in 1979, that identifies which pairs of groups differ after a significant Kruskal-Wallis or Friedman test. It builds a t-style statistic on the pooled ranks and is generally more powerful than the comparable Dunn test.The Nemenyi test is a nonparametric post-hoc multiple comparison procedure introduced by Peter Nemenyi in his 1963 Princeton doctoral thesis. It is applied after a significant Friedman test to identify which specific pairs of conditions differ from each other in a repeated-measures or blocked design.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: Conover-Iman Test · Nemenyi Test. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-18 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare