Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Vergelijkende discoursanalyse× | Vergelijkend narratief onderzoek× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Kwalitatief | Kwalitatief |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 1980s–1990s (established as comparative practice through the 1990s) | 1990s–2000s |
| Grondlegger≠ | Norman Fairclough; Ruth Wodak; Teun A. van Dijk | D. Jean Clandinin & F. Michael Connelly (narrative inquiry); comparative extension by the broader qualitative comparative tradition |
| Type≠ | Qualitative comparative research approach | Qualitative comparative research design |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman. ISBN: 978-0582219526 | Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787943523 |
| Aliassen | CDA comparative, cross-context discourse analysis, comparative text analysis, multi-site discourse analysis | comparative narrative inquiry, cross-case narrative research, narrative comparison, comparative narrative analysis |
| Verwant≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Comparative discourse analysis examines how language constructs meaning, identity, and power by systematically contrasting texts or speech acts drawn from at least two distinct contexts, groups, time periods, or institutions. By holding analytical categories constant across cases, it reveals how discursive patterns diverge or converge, producing insights that single-context discourse analysis cannot generate. | Comparative narrative research is a qualitative design that collects personal stories or life accounts from two or more participants, groups, or contexts and systematically compares them to reveal patterns, contrasts, and contextual influences. Drawing on narrative inquiry's attention to experience-as-story, it adds a deliberate comparative logic to identify what is shared, what diverges, and why differences emerge across cases. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|