Methoden vergelijken

	Vergelijkende Conversatieanalyse	Vergelijkende discoursanalyse
Vakgebied	Kwalitatief	Kwalitatief
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan	1974 (CA foundation); comparative applications from 1980s–1990s	1980s–1990s (established as comparative practice through the 1990s)
Grondlegger	Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, Gail Jefferson (CA foundation); comparative extension developed across the field from the 1980s onward	Norman Fairclough; Ruth Wodak; Teun A. van Dijk
Type	Qualitative micro-analytic research design	Qualitative comparative research approach
Oorspronkelijke bron	Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.	Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman. ISBN: 978-0582219526
Aliassen	comparative CA, cross-contextual conversation analysis, comparative interactional analysis, comparative talk-in-interaction	CDA comparative, cross-context discourse analysis, comparative text analysis, multi-site discourse analysis
Verwant	3	5
Samenvatting	Comparative Conversation Analysis (comparative CA) applies the rigorous micro-analytic methods of Conversation Analysis across two or more contrasting interactional settings, languages, cultures, or participant groups. It examines how the sequential organisation of talk — turn-taking, repair, adjacency pairs, and action formation — varies or remains stable across contexts, producing cross-contextual evidence about the architecture of human interaction.	Comparative discourse analysis examines how language constructs meaning, identity, and power by systematically contrasting texts or speech acts drawn from at least two distinct contexts, groups, time periods, or institutions. By holding analytical categories constant across cases, it reveals how discursive patterns diverge or converge, producing insights that single-context discourse analysis cannot generate.