ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Vergelijkende auto-etnografie×Reflexive Thematische Analyse×
VakgebiedKwalitatiefKwalitatief
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan1979 (autoethnography); comparative application formalized ~20132006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019
GrondleggerHayano (term); developed further by Ellis, Bochner, Chang, Ngunjiri & HernandezVirginia Braun & Victoria Clarke
TypeQualitative research designQualitative research method
Oorspronkelijke bronChang, H., Ngunjiri, F. W., & Hernandez, K.-A. C. (2013). Collaborative Autoethnography. Left Coast Press. ISBN: 978-1598745948Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
Aliassencollaborative autoethnography, multi-sited autoethnography, cross-cultural autoethnography, CAERTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis
Verwant66
SamenvattingComparative autoethnography is a qualitative design in which two or more researchers — or research participants — independently produce first-person self-narratives about a shared phenomenon and then systematically compare those accounts to generate broader cultural insight. By juxtaposing lived experiences that differ by context, identity, or setting, the approach moves beyond the single-voice limitations of traditional autoethnography while retaining its hallmark reflexivity and personal depth.Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: Comparative autoethnography · Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-18 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare