Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Bibliometrix-Assisted Narrative Review× | Co-citatieanalyse× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied≠ | Scientometrie | Bibliometrie |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 2017 (bibliometrix package); narrative review methodology is older | 1973 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Aria & Cuccurullo (bibliometrix R package); narrative review as a traditional form predates this tool | Henry Small |
| Type≠ | Mixed quantitative-qualitative review methodology | Method |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. DOI ↗ | Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. DOI ↗ |
| Aliassen≠ | bibliometrix narrative review, R-bibliometrix narrative synthesis, quantitative-assisted narrative review | co-citation mapping, historiograph, direct citation, citation pair analysis |
| Verwant≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Samenvatting≠ | A bibliometrix-assisted narrative review combines the quantitative field-mapping capabilities of the bibliometrix R package with the interpretive flexibility of a traditional narrative review. Bibliometric indicators — publication trends, author and country productivity, co-citation networks, keyword co-occurrence — are computed and visualised first to orient the reviewer, then a discursive, thematic narrative synthesises the intellectual content of key sources. The result is a structured yet flexible overview of a field that is more transparent and reproducible than a purely informal narrative. | Co-citation analysis is a method that identifies the intellectual structure of a research domain by examining how frequently pairs of documents are cited together in other publications. When two papers are frequently cited together in the literature, they are considered co-cited, indicating they are conceptually related or influential within the same research community. Developed by Henry Small in 1973, co-citation analysis maps the 'invisible colleges' of science—networks of researchers working on related problems—and reveals how knowledge domains evolve over time. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|