Methoden vergelijken

	Bayesian Scenario Analysis	Robuuste Scenario-Analyse
Vakgebied	Simulatie	Simulatie
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan	2000s	1950 (foundations); 2003 (modern RDM formulation)
Grondlegger	Developed iteratively across Bayesian statistics and scenario planning communities; formalized in risk and decision analysis (Aven, Lempert et al., 2000s)	Wald, A. (minimax foundation); Lempert et al. (RDM framework)
Type	Probabilistic hybrid — Bayesian inference integrated with structured scenario analysis	Scenario-based robustness evaluation
Oorspronkelijke bron	Aven, T., & Reniers, G. (2013). How to define and interpret a probability in a risk and safety setting. Safety Science, 51(1), 223–231.	Wald, A. (1950). Statistical Decision Functions. Wiley, New York.
Aliassen	BSA, Bayesian scenario planning, probabilistic scenario analysis, Bayesian-weighted scenario analysis	RSA, Robust Scenario Planning, Worst-Case Scenario Analysis, Minimax Regret Scenario Analysis
Verwant	5	5
Samenvatting	Bayesian Scenario Analysis (BSA) combines structured scenario planning with Bayesian probability theory, assigning explicit prior probabilities to alternative futures and updating them as new evidence or expert judgments become available. The result is a probability-weighted distribution of outcomes across scenarios rather than a set of equally-weighted or arbitrarily-weighted futures.	Robust Scenario Analysis evaluates a set of candidate strategies across a structured collection of plausible future scenarios and selects the strategy that performs acceptably well — or best in the worst case — regardless of which scenario materializes. It merges scenario planning with robustness criteria such as maximin, minimax regret, or satisficing to support decisions under deep, irreducible uncertainty.