Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Bayesian Entropy Balancing× | Bayesiaanse Propensity Score Matching× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Causale inferentie | Causale inferentie |
| Familie | Regression model | Regression model |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 2012-2020s | 2012 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Hainmueller (2012, entropy balancing foundation); Bayesian extension developed in subsequent causal inference literature | Kaplan & Chen (2012); foundational PSM by Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983) |
| Type≠ | Weighting-based causal estimator with Bayesian uncertainty quantification | Bayesian causal inference / matching |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Hainmueller, J. (2012). Entropy balancing for causal effects: A multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies. Political Analysis, 20(1), 25-46. DOI ↗ | Kaplan, D., & Chen, J. (2012). A Two-Step Bayesian Approach for Propensity Score Analysis: Simulations and Case Study. Psychometrika, 77(3), 581-609. DOI ↗ |
| Aliassen | BEB, Bayesian EB, Bayesian covariate balancing, entropy balancing with Bayesian inference | Bayesian PSM, BPSM, Bayesian matching estimator, Bayesian propensity weighting |
| Verwant | 6 | 6 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Bayesian Entropy Balancing extends the classical entropy balancing approach — which reweights control units so that their covariate moments match the treated group exactly — by embedding this reweighting within a Bayesian framework. This allows researchers to incorporate prior beliefs about treatment propensities, propagate parameter uncertainty into the final causal estimate, and obtain credible intervals rather than only classical confidence intervals. | Bayesian Propensity Score Matching (Bayesian PSM) extends classical propensity score matching by placing a prior distribution over the propensity model parameters and propagating posterior uncertainty through the matching and outcome stages. Introduced formally by Kaplan and Chen (2012), it offers a principled account of estimation uncertainty that frequentist matching commonly ignores, and allows incorporation of substantive prior knowledge about treatment selection. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|