ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Bayesiaanse studie naar diagnostische nauwkeurigheid×Evaluatie van screeningsinstrumenten×
VakgebiedEpidemiologieEpidemiologie
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan1995–20011968 (Wilson-Jungner principles); statistical framework developed 1970s–2000s
GrondleggerJoseph, Gyorkos & Coupal; Dendukuri & Joseph (formal Bayesian DTA framework)Wilson & Jungner (WHO criteria, 1968); foundational work by Pepe, Altman, and others in statistical test evaluation
TypeBayesian inferential study designObservational diagnostic / epidemiological evaluation design
Oorspronkelijke bronDendukuri, N., & Joseph, L. (2001). Bayesian approaches to modeling the conditional dependence between multiple diagnostic tests. Biometrics, 57(1), 158–167. DOI ↗Wilson, J. M. G., & Jungner, G. (1968). Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. World Health Organization. Public Health Papers No. 34. link ↗
AliassenBayesian DTA study, Bayesian test evaluation, Bayesian diagnostic test accuracy, BDASscreening study, screening performance evaluation, screening accuracy assessment, STE
Verwant66
SamenvattingA Bayesian diagnostic accuracy study evaluates how well a medical test distinguishes between people who have a condition and those who do not, using Bayesian statistical methods that formally incorporate prior knowledge into the estimation of sensitivity, specificity, and related measures. Unlike classical approaches that rely solely on the observed sample, Bayesian inference combines a likelihood model of the data with prior probability distributions to produce posterior estimates with intuitive credible intervals.Screening test evaluation is a systematic epidemiological approach for assessing whether a test or program can accurately and cost-effectively identify individuals with a condition before symptoms appear. It quantifies diagnostic performance metrics — sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and the ROC curve — and evaluates whether a screening program meets established public health criteria for adoption and harm-benefit balance.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: Bayesian Diagnostic Accuracy Study · Screening Test Evaluation. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-15 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare