Minimal Group Paradigm
The minimal group paradigm is an experimental procedure, introduced by Henri Tajfel and colleagues in 1971, that strips intergroup conflict down to its barest possible cause: mere categorization. Participants are sorted into two groups on a trivial or random basis (for example, an alleged preference for one painter over another, or a coin toss), never meet other members, gain nothing personally, and then allocate points between anonymous in-group and out-group members using structured reward matrices. The striking and repeatedly replicated finding is that people favor their own group even when the category is meaningless and favoritism brings them no material gain. The paradigm became the empirical cornerstone of social identity theory, demonstrating that the cognitive act of dividing the social world into 'us' and 'them' is itself sufficient to produce discrimination.
Baca kaedah sepenuhnya
Log masuk dengan akaun percuma untuk membaca bahagian ini.
Peta kaedah
Kejiranan kaedah berkaitan — pilih satu nod untuk meneroka.
Sumber
- Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149-178. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420010202 ↗
Cara memetik halaman ini
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Minimal Group Paradigm (Tajfel Categorization Experiment). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ms/social-psychology/minimal-group-paradigm
Kaedah yang mana?
Letakkan kaedah ini di sebelah kaedah yang paling rapat dengannya dan baca secara bersebelahan — perpustakaan menyusun buku di atas meja; pilihan terletak pada anda.
- False Consensus ParadigmPsikologi Sosial↔ banding
- Social Relations ModelPsikologi Sosial↔ banding
- Stereotype Content ModelPsikologi Sosial↔ banding
Dirujuk oleh
Kaedah serupa
Terjumpa masalah pada halaman ini? Laporkan atau cadangkan pembetulan →