Bureaucratic Reputation Analysis
Bureaucratic reputation analysis is an analytical framework for explaining the behaviour, power and autonomy of public agencies through the lens of their reputation — the set of symbolic beliefs about an agency's capacities, intentions and history held by its many audiences. Developed by Daniel Carpenter, notably in his 2001 study of how U.S. executive agencies forged autonomy, and elaborated with George Krause, the framework treats reputation as a strategic asset that agencies cultivate and protect. It distinguishes performative, moral, technical and procedural dimensions of reputation and traces how reputational concerns drive what agencies do.
Baca kaedah sepenuhnya
Log masuk dengan akaun percuma untuk membaca bahagian ini.
Peta kaedah
Kejiranan kaedah berkaitan — pilih satu nod untuk meneroka.
Sumber
- Carpenter, D. P. (2001). The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN: 9780691070100
- Carpenter, D. P., & Krause, G. A. (2012). Reputation and Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 26–32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02506.x ↗
Cara memetik halaman ini
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Bureaucratic Reputation Analysis of Public Agencies. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ms/public-administration/bureaucratic-reputation-analysis
Kaedah yang mana?
Letakkan kaedah ini di sebelah kaedah yang paling rapat dengannya dan baca secara bersebelahan — perpustakaan menyusun buku di atas meja; pilihan terletak pada anda.
- New Public Management AssessmentPublic Administration↔ banding
- Regulatory Enforcement AnalysisPublic Administration↔ banding
- Transparency IndexPublic Administration↔ banding
- Whole-of-Government AnalysisPublic Administration↔ banding
Dirujuk oleh
Kaedah serupa
Terjumpa masalah pada halaman ini? Laporkan atau cadangkan pembetulan →