ScholarGate
Pembantu
Process / pipelineComparative welfare-state research

Welfare Regime Analysis

Welfare regime analysis classifies welfare states not by how much they spend but by the qualitative logic of how they distribute welfare, following Gosta Esping-Andersen's 1990 The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Its two organizing concepts are decommodification — the degree to which people can sustain a livelihood independent of the market — and stratification — the patterns of social inequality that welfare arrangements reproduce or alter. On these dimensions Esping-Andersen identified three clustered regime types: the liberal, the conservative-corporatist, and the social-democratic. His 1999 sequel extended the framework to the family and the postindustrial service economy, and a large critical literature has since debated additional types.

Buka dalam MethodMindTidak lama lagiGuna, banding, dapatkan panduan
Alat & sumber
Muat turun slaid
Pelajari & terokai
VideoTidak lama lagi

Baca kaedah sepenuhnya

Ahli sahaja

Log masuk dengan akaun percuma untuk membaca bahagian ini.

Log masuk

Peta kaedah

Kejiranan kaedah berkaitan — pilih satu nod untuk meneroka.

Sumber

  1. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton University Press. ISBN: 9780691028576
  2. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780198742005

Cara memetik halaman ini

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Welfare Regime Analysis (Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ms/political-economy/welfare-regime-analysis

Kaedah yang mana?

Letakkan kaedah ini di sebelah kaedah yang paling rapat dengannya dan baca secara bersebelahan — perpustakaan menyusun buku di atas meja; pilihan terletak pada anda.

Bandingkan secara bersebelahan

Dirujuk oleh

ScholarGateWelfare Regime Analysis (Welfare Regime Analysis (Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism)). Dicapai 2026-06-24 daripada https://scholargate.app/ms/political-economy/welfare-regime-analysis · Set data: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026