Territorial Conflict Analysis
Territorial conflict analysis tests the proposition — central to the 'territorial explanation of war' — that what states fight over matters, and that disputes over territory are especially war-prone. Vasquez and Henehan (2001) operationalize this by coding disputes for the issue at stake (territory, policy, regime) and comparing how often each type escalates to war. The consistent finding that territorial disputes are more likely to lead to war than other kinds reframes the study of conflict around the contested issue rather than only the attributes of the disputants.
Baca kaedah sepenuhnya
Log masuk dengan akaun percuma untuk membaca bahagian ini.
Peta kaedah
Kejiranan kaedah berkaitan — pilih satu nod untuk meneroka.
Sumber
- Vasquez, J., & Henehan, M. T. (2001). Territorial disputes and the probability of war, 1816–1992. Journal of Peace Research, 38(2), 123–138. DOI: 10.1177/0022343301038002001 ↗
Cara memetik halaman ini
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Analysis of Territorial Disputes and the Probability of War. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ms/international-relations/territorial-conflict-analysis
Kaedah yang mana?
Letakkan kaedah ini di sebelah kaedah yang paling rapat dengannya dan baca secara bersebelahan — perpustakaan menyusun buku di atas meja; pilihan terletak pada anda.
- Dyadic Conflict AnalysisInternational Relations↔ banding
- Enduring Rivalry AnalysisInternational Relations↔ banding
- Militarized Interstate Dispute AnalysisInternational Relations↔ banding
Kaedah serupa
Terjumpa masalah pada halaman ini? Laporkan atau cadangkan pembetulan →