ScholarGate
Pembantu
MCDMGame-theoretic / formal IR

Bargaining Model of War

The bargaining model of war, given its canonical statement by James Fearon in 'Rationalist Explanations for War' (1995), treats war not as the failure of reason but as a failure of bargaining. Because fighting is costly and uncertain, there almost always exists a peaceful division of the disputed stakes that both rational states would prefer to the gamble of war. The puzzle, and the model's central contribution, is to identify the specific conditions — private information with incentives to misrepresent, commitment problems, and issue indivisibility — under which rational, unitary states nonetheless fail to reach such a settlement.

Buka dalam MethodMindTidak lama lagiGuna, banding, dapatkan panduan
Alat & sumber
Muat turun slaid
Pelajari & terokai
VideoTidak lama lagi

Baca kaedah sepenuhnya

Ahli sahaja

Log masuk dengan akaun percuma untuk membaca bahagian ini.

Log masuk

Peta kaedah

Kejiranan kaedah berkaitan — pilih satu nod untuk meneroka.

Sumber

  1. Fearon, J. D. (1995). Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization, 49(3), 379–414. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818300033324

Cara memetik halaman ini

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Rationalist Bargaining Model of War (Fearon). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ms/international-relations/bargaining-model-of-war

Kaedah yang mana?

Letakkan kaedah ini di sebelah kaedah yang paling rapat dengannya dan baca secara bersebelahan — perpustakaan menyusun buku di atas meja; pilihan terletak pada anda.

Bandingkan secara bersebelahan

Dirujuk oleh

ScholarGateBargaining Model of War (Rationalist Bargaining Model of War (Fearon)). Dicapai 2026-06-24 daripada https://scholargate.app/ms/international-relations/bargaining-model-of-war · Set data: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026