Rekod bukti kaedah

Computerized adaptive test construct validity

Construct validity in computerized adaptive testing evaluates whether the latent trait estimates produced by a CAT instrument genuinely measure the intended psychological or educational construct. Because adaptive algorithms select items individually for each examinee, the validity evidence gathered must account for the variable item exposure and the IRT-based scoring that are unique to CAT administrations.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Rekod sumber

Petikan disalin secara verbatim daripada rekod sumber kaedah. Tiada pengesahan peringkat tuntutan disimpulkan daripadanya.

Construct Validity in Computerized Adaptive Testing

Rekod kaedah taksonomik · latent-structure / psychometrics

Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). American Council on Education / Macmillan. · URL
van der Linden, W. J. & Glas, C. A. W. (Eds.). (2010). Elements of Adaptive Testing. Springer. · ISBN 978-0387854595

Buka kaedah penuh

Tuntutan yang dikurasi

Tuntutan disimpan dalam lejar bukti, setiap satu dengan penilaiannya sendiri.

Tiada tuntutan terkurasi lagi

Pandangan ini tidak mencipta penilaian tuntutan apabila lejar tiada.

Kaedah berkaitan

Dijana daripada graf kaedah dan ditunjukkan sebagai perhubungan yang dicadangkan mesin — tiada tuntutan bukti disimpulkan.

Taxonomic bucketComputerized Adaptive Test Convergent Validitymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketComputerized adaptive test item response theorymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketComputerized adaptive test measurement invariancemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketConfirmatory factor analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketConstruct Validitymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketDifferential Item Functioningmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.