Bandingkan kaedah
Semak kaedah pilihan anda secara bersebelahan; baris yang berbeza akan diserlahkan.
| Pemodelan Persamaan Struktur Robust× | Analisis Faktor Pengesahan (CFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang≠ | Statistik | Psikometrik |
| Keluarga | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Tahun asal≠ | 1994 | 1969 |
| Pengasas≠ | Albert Satorra & Peter M. Bentler | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| Jenis≠ | Latent variable / path model with robust inference | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Satorra, A. & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis (pp. 399–419). Sage. link ↗ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | Robust SEM, SEM with robust standard errors, Satorra-Bentler SEM, non-normal SEM | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| Berkaitan≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Ringkasan≠ | Robust structural equation modeling (Robust SEM) applies the full SEM framework — simultaneous estimation of measurement and structural relations among latent variables — while using corrected test statistics and sandwich standard errors that remain valid when observed data depart from multivariate normality. The Satorra-Bentler scaled chi-square is the most widely used correction. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|