Bandingkan kaedah

	Analisis ROC Mantap	Analisis Saiz Kesan Robust
Bidang	Statistik	Statistik
Keluarga	Hypothesis test	Hypothesis test
Tahun asal	1990s–2000s	2005 (formalized)
Pengasas	Multiple contributors (Pepe, Qin, Zhou, and others)	Algina, Keselman & Penfield; Wilcox
Jenis	Robust diagnostic accuracy evaluation	Robust effect size estimation
Sumber perintis	Pepe, M. S. (2000). An interpretation for the ROC curve and inference using GLM procedures. Biometrics, 56(2), 352–359.	Algina, J., Keselman, H. J., & Penfield, R. D. (2005). An alternative to Cohen's standardized mean difference effect size: A robust parameter and confidence interval in the two independent groups case. Psychological Methods, 10(3), 317–328.
Alias	robust AUC analysis, outlier-resistant ROC, robust diagnostic accuracy analysis, robust sensitivity-specificity analysis	robust Cohen's d, trimmed-mean effect size, outlier-resistant effect size, robust standardized mean difference
Berkaitan	3	5
Ringkasan	Robust ROC analysis evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of a continuous or ordinal biomarker in distinguishing between two groups (e.g., diseased vs. healthy) while protecting against the distorting effects of outliers, non-normality, or distributional violations that can bias standard parametric ROC estimates and AUC confidence intervals.	Robust effect size analysis quantifies the magnitude of a difference or association using estimators that are resistant to outliers and violations of normality. Rather than relying on classical statistics such as Cohen's d based on sample means and standard deviations, robust variants use trimmed means and Winsorized standard deviations to produce effect size estimates that accurately reflect the typical effect rather than being inflated by extreme values.