ScholarGate
Pembantu

Araştırma Yöntemleri

8 kaedah dalam keluarga ini.

Sorotan

Analisis Undang-undang KesCase law analysis is a systematic method for examining judicial decisions to identify binding legal rules, evolving doctrines, and interpretive trends. Rooted in the common law traPenyelidikan Undang-Undang Doktrinal PerbandinganComparative doctrinal legal research systematically identifies, expounds, and compares the legal rules, principles, and doctrines governing the same problem across two or more juriAnalisis Perbandingan Undang-undangComparative legal analysis is a structured research method that examines how two or more legal systems — whether national, regional, or supranational — address a common legal problAnalisis Kes Undang-undang KritikalCritical case law analysis applies the theoretical tools of Critical Legal Studies (CLS) to the examination of judicial decisions. Rather than accepting legal reasoning at face valPenyelidikan Undang-undang Doktrinal KritikalCritical doctrinal legal research combines traditional black-letter legal analysis — systematically mapping the rules, principles, and doctrines found in statutes and case law — wiAnalisis Kandungan Perundangan Berfokus PenilaianEvaluation-focused legal content analysis is a systematic method for examining legal texts — statutes, regulations, court decisions, contracts, or policy documents — with an explic

Laluan bacaan

Kaedah asas yang paling banyak dirujuk bagi topik ini, mengikut susunan ia dibangunkan — tempat untuk bermula jika anda baharu di sini.

  1. Analisis Perbandingan Undang-undangLate 19th century; formalised 1900oleh Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (early conceptualisation); Raymond Saleilles and Édouard Lambert (modern discipline, 1900 Paris Congress)
  2. Analisis Kandungan Perundangan1940s–1970s (applied systematically to legal texts)oleh Interdisciplinary; foundational content analysis by Harold Lasswell (1940s); applied to legal texts by empirical legal scholars from the 1970s onward
  3. Penyelidikan Undang-Undang Doktrinal Perbandingan19th century origins; modern systematic form 1960s–1998oleh Rooted in classical comparative law (Anselm von Feuerbach, early 19th c.); systematised by Zweigert & Kötz (1998)
  4. Analisis Undang-undang Perbandingan MemanjangLate 20th century (comparative law foundational texts 1960s–1998; longitudinal integration from 1990s onward)oleh Konrad Zweigert and Hein Kotz (comparative law foundation); longitudinal dimension integrated in socio-legal and legal history scholarship
  5. Analisis Kes Undang-undang KritikalLate 1970s–1980s (CLS conference 1977; Unger 1983)oleh Critical Legal Studies (CLS) movement; key figures include Duncan Kennedy, Roberto Unger, Mark Tushnet
  6. Penyelidikan Undang-undang Doktrinal Kritikal1970s–1980s (Critical Legal Studies movement; applied to doctrinal method from 1980s onward)oleh Synthesized from Traditional Doctrinal Legal Research and Critical Legal Studies (Roberto Unger, Duncan Kennedy, and others)
  7. Analisis Kandungan Perundangan Berfokus PenilaianLate 20th century; evaluation-focused applications emerged prominently from the 1990s onwardoleh Builds on Klaus Krippendorff's content analysis framework and legal scholarship traditions
  8. Analisis Undang-undang KesMedieval English common law; academic formalisation 19th–20th centuryoleh Common law tradition (England); systematised in Anglo-American jurisprudence

Semua kaedah 8

Analisis Undang-undang KesPenyelidikan Undang-Undang Doktrinal PerbandinganAnalisis Perbandingan Undang-undangAnalisis Kes Undang-undang KritikalPenyelidikan Undang-undang Doktrinal KritikalAnalisis Kandungan Perundangan Berfokus PenilaianAnalisis Kandungan PerundanganAnalisis Undang-undang Perbandingan Memanjang

Lagi dalam Undang-undang

İstatistik 7Karar Bilimleri 2Ölçme & Psikometri 8