Glock-Stark Religiosity Dimensions
The Glock-Stark framework, set out in Charles Glock and Rodney Stark's 1965 Religion and Society in Tension, recast religiosity from a single global trait into five analytically distinct dimensions of religious commitment: belief (ideological), practice (ritualistic), experience (experiential), knowledge (intellectual), and consequences (the effects of religion on everyday conduct). The core claim is that an individual can rank high on one dimension and low on another, so a one-number measure of 'how religious' someone is conceals more than it reveals. Operationally, each dimension is tapped by its own cluster of survey items, scaled separately, and the correlations among the dimensions are themselves an object of study. This multidimensional measurement model became the template for nearly all later psychometric work on religiousness.
Lasīt pilno metodes aprakstu
Piesakieties ar bezmaksas kontu, lai lasītu šo sadaļu.
Metožu karte
Saistīto metožu apkaime — atlasiet mezglu, lai izpētītu.
Avoti
- Glock, C. Y., & Stark, R. (1965). Religion and Society in Tension. Chicago: Rand McNally. link ↗
- Huber, S., & Huber, O. W. (2012). The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS). Religions, 3(3), 710-724. DOI: 10.3390/rel3030710 ↗
Kā citēt šo lapu
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Glock-Stark Multidimensional Religiosity (Five Dimensions of Religious Commitment). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/lv/religious-studies/glock-stark-religiosity
Kura metode?
Novietojiet šo metodi blakus tās tuvākajām radniecīgajām metodēm un lasiet tās līdzās — bibliotēka noliek grāmatas uz galda; izvēle ir jūsu.
- Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS)Religious Studies↔ salīdzināt
- Faith Maturity ScaleReligious Studies↔ salīdzināt
- Religious Orientation Scale (ROS)Religious Studies↔ salīdzināt
Uz to atsaucas
Līdzīgas metodes
Pamanījāt kļūdu šajā lapā? Ziņojiet vai ierosiniet labojumu →