ScholarGate
Asistents
MCDMCollective action / institutional theory

Common-Pool Resource Analysis

Common-pool resource (CPR) analysis is a framework for diagnosing why shared natural and man-made resources are prone to overuse and for identifying the institutional conditions under which user communities can govern them sustainably without privatization or top-down state control. A common-pool resource is rivalrous (one user's consumption subtracts from what is available to others) yet costly to exclude users from. Garrett Hardin's 1968 'tragedy of the commons' framed the pessimistic baseline in which rational appropriators collectively destroy the resource, while Elinor Ostrom's 1990 Governing the Commons established, through extensive empirical work, eight design principles that distinguish durable self-governing commons from those that collapse.

Atvērt MethodMindDrīzumāLietojiet, salīdziniet, saņemiet norādījumus
Rīki un resursi
Lejupielādēt slaidus
Mācieties un izpētiet
VideoDrīzumā

Lasīt pilno metodes aprakstu

Tikai dalībniekiem

Piesakieties ar bezmaksas kontu, lai lasītu šo sadaļu.

Pieteikties

Metožu karte

Saistīto metožu apkaime — atlasiet mezglu, lai izpētītu.

Avoti

  1. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521405997
  2. Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243-1248. DOI: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243

Kā citēt šo lapu

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Common-Pool Resource Governance Analysis (Ostrom Design Principles). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/lv/political-economy/common-pool-resource-analysis

Kura metode?

Novietojiet šo metodi blakus tās tuvākajām radniecīgajām metodēm un lasiet tās līdzās — bibliotēka noliek grāmatas uz galda; izvēle ir jūsu.

Salīdzināt blakus
ScholarGateCommon-Pool Resource Analysis (Common-Pool Resource Governance Analysis (Ostrom Design Principles)). Izgūts 2026-06-24 no https://scholargate.app/lv/political-economy/common-pool-resource-analysis · Datu kopa: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026