Poverty Dynamics Analysis
Poverty Dynamics Analysis uses household panel data to study how poverty changes over time for the same people, distinguishing those who are persistently poor from those who move in and out of poverty. Building on the work of Jyotsna Jalan and Martin Ravallion (1998) and the comparative synthesis of Bob Baulch and John Hoddinott (2000), it reframes poverty from a static headcount into a study of entries, exits, and spells. Its central output is a separation of total poverty into a chronic component, attributable to persistently low living standards, and a transient component, attributable to fluctuations around the poverty line over time.
Lasīt pilno metodes aprakstu
Piesakieties ar bezmaksas kontu, lai lasītu šo sadaļu.
Metožu karte
Saistīto metožu apkaime — atlasiet mezglu, lai izpētītu.
Avoti
- Jalan, J., & Ravallion, M. (1998). Transient Poverty in Postreform Rural China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 26(2), 338–357. DOI: 10.1006/jcec.1998.1518 ↗
- Baulch, B., & Hoddinott, J. (2000). Economic Mobility and Poverty Dynamics in Developing Countries. Journal of Development Studies, 36(6), 1–24. DOI: 10.1080/00220380008422652 ↗
Kā citēt šo lapu
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Poverty Dynamics and Transitions Analysis. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/lv/development-studies/poverty-dynamics-analysis
Kura metode?
Novietojiet šo metodi blakus tās tuvākajām radniecīgajām metodēm un lasiet tās līdzās — bibliotēka noliek grāmatas uz galda; izvēle ir jūsu.
- Asset Poverty Trap AnalysisDevelopment Studies↔ salīdzināt
- Household Livelihood SurveyDevelopment Studies↔ salīdzināt
- Livelihood Vulnerability AssessmentDevelopment Studies↔ salīdzināt
- Multidimensional Poverty IndexEkonomika↔ salīdzināt
Uz to atsaucas
Līdzīgas metodes
Pamanījāt kļūdu šajā lapā? Ziņojiet vai ierosiniet labojumu →