Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Z-skaitļu analītiskās hierarhijas process× | Z-skaitļu paplašinājums EDAS metodei× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Lēmumu pieņemšana | Lēmumu pieņemšana |
| Saime | MCDM | MCDM |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2020 | 2011 |
| Autors≠ | Mahammad Nuriyev (Khazar University, Baku, Azerbaijan) | Zadeh, L. A. |
| Tips≠ | Hierarchical pairwise comparison weighting under Z-number uncertainty | Z-Number outranking/ranking — Z-Number (Z = (A, B): restriction A, reliability B; both fuzzy) |
| Pirmavots≠ | Nuriyev, M. (2020). Z-numbers Based Hybrid MCDM Approach for Energy Resources Ranking and Selection. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy DOI ↗ | Zadeh, L. A. (2011). A note on Z-numbers. Information Sciences DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | — | — |
| Saistītās | 8 | 8 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Z-AHP (Z-Number Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weighting multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Mahammad Nuriyev (Khazar University, Baku, Azerbaijan) in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | Z-EDAS (Z-Number extension of EDAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zadeh, L. A. in 2011. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|