Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Jogas pašefektivitātes skala× | Mūzikas terapijas novērtēšanas rīks× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Integratīvā medicīna | Integratīvā medicīna |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2010 | 2008 |
| Autors≠ | Based on Bandura's self-efficacy theory; adapted for yoga practice | Hanson, B.; Clark, M.; Plante, W. |
| Tips≠ | Self-report efficacy and confidence scale | Multi-method: client self-report, clinician observation, behavioral coding |
| Pirmavots≠ | Cramer, H., Hall, H., & Leach, M. J. (2016). Systematic review and meta-analysis of yoga for low back pain: A 2016 update. Spine Journal, 16(12), 1547–1557. link ↗ | Thaut, M. H. (2005). Rhythm, music, and the brain: Scientific foundations and clinical applications. New York: Routledge. link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | YSES, Yoga Efficacy Scale | MTAT, Music Therapy Outcome Measures |
| Saistītās | 4 | 4 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | The YSES measures an individual's confidence and perceived ability to successfully perform yoga practice, overcome barriers, and sustain a regular yoga routine. Grounded in Bandura's self-efficacy theory, it predicts adherence to yoga programs and likelihood of realizing health benefits in clinical and community populations. | The MTAT is a comprehensive assessment instrument for measuring client outcomes and music therapist competency in music therapy. Developed by Hanson and colleagues, it operationalizes music therapy impact across emotional, social, behavioral, and physiological domains, suitable for diverse populations including psychiatric, pediatric, geriatric, and neurological populations. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|