Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| WHODAS 2.0× | Dalības mērs pēc akūtās aprūpes× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Rehabilitācijas zinātne | Rehabilitācijas zinātne |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2010 | 2012 |
| Autors≠ | World Health Organization | Wang, Hart, Stratford, Mioduski |
| Tips≠ | Self-report or Clinician-administered | Clinician-rated |
| Pirmavots≠ | World Health Organization. (2010). Measuring Health and Disability: Manual for WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0). WHO Publications. link ↗ | Wang, Y. C., Hart, D. L., Stratford, P. W., & Mioduski, J. E. (2012). Baseline dependency, not diagnosis, drives therapy intensity and discharge outcome after inpatient rehabilitation. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 21(6), 431–437. link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | WHODAS-36, WHODAS-12 | PM-PAC, PAC |
| Saistītās | 5 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | WHODAS 2.0 is a standardized, WHO-developed instrument that measures disability and functioning across six core life domains in any population aged 18 and above. Introduced in 2010, it operationalizes the biopsychosocial model of disability using the International Classification of Functioning (ICF) framework, making it applicable to chronic disease, physical injury, mental health, and aging contexts. | The Participation Measure for Post-Acute Care (PM-PAC) is a brief, clinician-administered tool designed to measure functional participation and independence in hospitalized rehabilitation patients across self-care, mobility, cognition, and social domains. Developed by Wang, Hart, Stratford, and Mioduski, PM-PAC is widely used in inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRF) and skilled nursing facilities (SNF) to track progress, predict discharge outcomes, and inform therapy intensity planning. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|