ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

VOSviewer atbalstīta metaanalīze×Sistemātiska literatūras apskate×
NozareZinātnometrijaZinātnometrija
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads2010s (integration practice emerged after VOSviewer release in 2010)1993 (Cochrane Collaboration); 2004 (Kitchenham SLR guidelines)
AutorsWorkflow combining Glass (1976) meta-analysis with van Eck & Waltman (2010) VOSviewerArchie Cochrane (conceptual foundation); formalized by the Cochrane Collaboration (1993) and Barbara Kitchenham in software engineering (2004)
TipsTool-assisted evidence synthesis workflowEvidence synthesis methodology
Pirmavotsvan Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. DOI ↗Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Keele University Technical Report TR/SE-0401. link ↗
Citi nosaukumibibliometric-enhanced meta-analysis, VOSviewer meta-analysis workflow, science-mapping assisted meta-analysis, network-visualisation meta-analysisSLR, systematic review, evidence synthesis review, structured literature review
Saistītās55
KopsavilkumsVOSviewer-assisted meta-analysis integrates the bibliometric network visualisation capabilities of VOSviewer into the literature identification and mapping phases of a standard meta-analysis. Before the statistical pooling of effect sizes begins, VOSviewer is used to visualise co-citation networks, keyword co-occurrence maps, and publication clusters, helping researchers comprehensively delineate the research field and identify all eligible primary studies for quantitative synthesis.A systematic literature review (SLR) is a structured, reproducible method for identifying, appraising, and synthesizing all relevant studies on a research question. Unlike a narrative review, it follows an explicit, pre-specified protocol — from database search strings through inclusion criteria to data extraction — so that the process is transparent, auditable, and replicable by other researchers. It is widely used in medicine, education, software engineering, and the social sciences to produce the most comprehensive possible evidence base on a topic.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: VOSviewer-assisted meta-analysis · Systematic Literature Review. Izgūts 2026-06-20 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare