Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Vizualizācijas gadījumu izpētes metodika× | Dalības darbības pētniecība (DPP)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Kvalitatīvās metodes | Kvalitatīvās metodes |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2002 (photo elicitation formalised); integrated approach emerged 2000s–2010s | 1940s (Lewin); PAR as distinct tradition formalised ~1970s–1980s |
| Autors≠ | Douglas Harper (photo elicitation); Robert K. Yin (case study framework) | Kurt Lewin (action research foundations, 1940s); systematised for participatory contexts by Orlando Fals Borda, Paulo Freire, and William Foote Whyte |
| Tips≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative research method |
| Pirmavots≠ | Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26. DOI ↗ | Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. Springer. link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | photo elicitation case study, image-based case study, visual methods case study, elicitation-based case study | PAR, community-based participatory research, collaborative action research, participatory inquiry |
| Saistītās≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Visual elicitation case study is a qualitative design that embeds photo or image elicitation within a case study framework. Participants respond to photographs, drawings, or other visual materials during in-depth interviews, generating richer and often unexpected data than verbal questioning alone. The case study structure then situates these image-prompted accounts within a bounded real-world context — an individual, organization, community, or event — enabling a holistic, detailed understanding of the case. | Participatory Action Research (PAR) is a qualitative, community-centred methodology in which researchers and community members collaborate as co-investigators to identify a shared problem, take deliberate action, observe outcomes, and reflect critically on results — cycling iteratively until meaningful change is achieved. Unlike conventional research that studies people from the outside, PAR treats participants as active agents who co-own the research process, the knowledge produced, and the practical interventions that follow. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|