Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Vizuālā analogā skala sāpēm× | Skaitliskā sāpju novērtēšanas skala× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare≠ | Klīniskā novērtēšana | Veselības aprūpes pakalpojumi |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1974 | 1986 |
| Autors≠ | E. Carl Huskisson | Mark P. Jensen and colleagues |
| Tips≠ | Pain intensity measurement | Unidimensional pain severity measurement |
| Pirmavots≠ | Huskisson, E. C. (1974). Measurement of pain. Lancet, 2(7889), 1127-1131. DOI ↗ | Jensen, M. P., Karoly, P., & Braver, S. (1986). The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain, 27(3), 297-307. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | VAS, Pain VAS, Visual Rating Scale | NRS, NRS-11, NRS-101 |
| Saistītās | 2 | 2 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a 10-centimeter line for measuring pain intensity, developed by Huskisson in 1974. Patients mark their current pain level along the continuum from no pain to worst pain imaginable. It remains one of the most widely used single-item pain measures in clinical practice and research. | The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is a single-item, self-report measure of pain intensity developed by Jensen and colleagues in 1986. Patients rate their pain on an 11-point scale (0-10) where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst pain imaginable. The NRS is among the most widely used pain severity measures in clinical practice and research due to its simplicity, rapid administration, and robust measurement properties. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|